|
Change to U.S. Tax Law Limits Fractional Donations of Art
Collectors who have donated fractional interests in works of art in the
past may want to reconsider this giving technique going forward. Recent
changes to U.S. tax law have had a chilling effect on fractional
donations.
Recent Legislation Impacts Planning Technique
According to Sharon Klein, Senior Vice President and Director of Estate
Advisement at Fiduciary Trust, the changes were included in an
inconspicuous section of the Pension Protection Act signed by President
Bush on August 17, 2006. The changes apply only to fractional gifts made
after the law was enacted.
The relevant section of the new law pertains to a tax-planning technique
known as fractional giving, which had become an increasingly popular way
for collectors to donate works of art.
The Technique - Donors Retained Possession While Taking Tax
Deduction
Fractional giving involves a donor gifting a partial interest in a
particular piece to a museum or other charity. In exchange, the donor
receives a tax deduction for a proportionate amount of the artwork's
market value.
The charitable entity receives the right to hold the art for an
equivalent portion of the year. For example, if a collector donates 10%
of a work of art to a museum, the museum is entitled to possession of
the piece for 37 days a year. The donor is entitled to keep the work for
the remainder of the year; in fact, museums have often waived their
right to hold artwork until it is needed for a particular exhibition.
Donors can make subsequent donations of additional fractional interests
in the artwork, allowing them to take deductions over a number of years
before the museum eventually obtains full ownership.
Under the old law, says Klein, donors who spread out their fractional
donations over an extended period could not only continue to enjoy
possession of the artwork; to the extent the artwork appreciated, they
would also get the benefit of a larger income tax deduction for each
successive gift because the value of the artwork was determined at the
time of each gift.
Reforms Create Possible Tax Trap
The new law caps the value of the contribution at the lesser of the fair
market value of the property on the date of the gift or the fair market
value of the property at the time the first fractional gift was made.
Thus, donors will not get larger income tax deductions on subsequent
donations if the value of the work increases, but they will get smaller
deductions if the value declines. In fact, there is a possible tax trap
for donors. If artwork has appreciated from the time of the initial
gift, the donor may end up owing gift tax on subsequent fractional
interest gifts because the gift is valued at its full market value and
the charitable deduction is limited to the initial contribution value.
Furthermore, Klein says the new law mandates that the charity must now
receive full ownership of the piece within 10 years or upon the death of
the donor, whichever occurs first. In addition, the charitable entity
must have had "substantial possession" of the artwork during the period
thereby depriving the owner of continued use of the piece.
Finally, the charity receiving the donation must actually use the piece
in connection with its tax-exempt purpose; in other words, says Klein,
the museum cannot simply place the piece in storage or auction it off.
Failure to Comply Results in Tax and Interest Penalties
Fractional donors who fail to meet these new requirements will find
themselves having to recapture the deduction for the donation. That is,
they will have to recognize the previously deducted income and pay tax
on that income as well as an interest charge on the tax underpayment.
The recaptured amount is also subject to a 10% penalty.
Consider Gifting Remaining Interest
Klein says that the new law creates many disincentives for utilizing the
fractional gift technique and it will probably not make planning sense
for those donors who were considering using it for the first time. The
new law will also affect those donors who have previously given
fractional interest gifts and anticipated further fractional gifting.
Even if a donor had previously gifted a fractional interest in artwork,
the first fractional gift after August 17, 2006 will be considered the
initial gift for valuation purposes. Donors in that situation may want
to consider gifting their entire remaining interest in the piece at one
time, so the gift will be valued for tax purposes at its then current
market value.
If you have any questions please contact Sharon Klein
at SKlein@ftci.com
|